Abstract: We compare and play a part various play in metrics for two of the latest and most animatronics efficient Bitcoin mining products, MicroBTs Whatsminer M30S+ and Bitmains Antminer S19 Pro. Obviously the more expensive 7nm Bitmain product is more powerful, however the miners are lovely thesame in terms of output. Our data beyond a sudden three hours of daylight grow old shows that the Bitmain miner has slightly stronger produce an effect than the Whatsminer, however the Whatsminer appears to have well along stability. In general, both machines are impressive and we predict the two companies will be in neck and neck competition greater than the neighboring few years.

Antminer S19 gain vs Whatsminer M30s

Following on from our June 2020 piece, the Battle For ASIC Supremacy, in this balance we dive into the details of the flagship products from two of the leading ASIC manufacturing contenders. MicroBTs Whatsminer M30S+, simple for US$1,580 and Bitmains Antminer S19 Pro, in the manner of a list price of US$2,407. In this story we experimented following the two products, executive each miner for three days and recording various acquit yourself metrics, such as the hashrate, facility usage, temperature, unassailable level and even the freshen flow readiness from the main outlet.

It should be noted that the Whatsminer M30S+ is not MicroBTs most unbiased product and a more efficient Whatsminer M30S++ has been released.

MinerReported Hashrate (TH/s)Efficiency (J/TH)

Antminer S199534.5

Antminer S19 Pro11029.5

Whatsminer M30S+10034.0

Whatsminer M30S++11231.0

Hashrate

Bitmains S19 plus has a reported hashrate of 110 TH/s, while the Whatsminer M30S+ can reportedly generate 100 TH/s. This is an incredible amount of hash attempts for one machine, greater than 100 trillion attempts at finding Bitcoins block hash per second. As Figure 1 under illustrates, in the get older both miners achieved a hashrate roughly speaking their respective strive for level.

After upgrading the firmware to the latest version, the Whatsminer M30S+ achieved an average hashrate of 103.8 TH/s, 3.8% above the advertised level, though Bitmains S19 lead achieved 110.7 TH/s, 0.6% above the advertised figure. As the chart plus indicates, the Whatsminer obtained a more stable hashrate, subsequently a variance significantly less than the Bitmain product in the period. We adjudicate this stability a significant factor in favour of MicroBT.

Variances in the hashrate can in addition to be driven by swap laboratory analysis environments. In our suit the teetotal was suitably hot and this may have impacted the results.

Figures 2 and 3 under advocate the hashrate for each miner as reported by the mining pool, based on 15 minute windows and consequently has later variance.

Figure 2 Whatsminer M30S+ Pool Reported Hashrate (TH/s)

Antminer S19 help vs Whatsminer M30S+: cartoon efficiency

As Figures 4 and 5 under indicate, similar to it comes to life efficiency, both products performed well, in extraction following the advertised figures. In the epoch the Whatsminer used an average of 34.4 J/TH, 1.0% above the advertised figure of 34 J/TH. The Antminer fared slightly better, it used an average of 29.7 J/TH, 0.6% above the advertised rate.

Whatsminer tall capacity Mode

The Whatsminer M30S+ with has an substitute of a high power mode, which we experimented with for one day. As Figure 6 under shows, during this grow old the miner produced an average output of 109.4 TH/s, a significant enlargement compared to normal power mode. Of course this then consumes more power, 3,743 W, compared to 3,331 W in normal conditions.

In tall aptitude mode the Whatsminer had marginally augmented vibrancy efficiency, later than an average rate of 34.3 J/TH.

Temperature Comparison

One of the most significant differences together with the devices, in Bitmains favour, is the average temperature of the miners. We measured the temperature every hour, by placing an electronic thermometer 15cm away from the main air outlet, directly in the let breathe stream. The Antminer was on average 45.9C, vis–vis 10.5C cooler compared to the Whatsminer. We adjudicate this a significant difference, in favour of the Antminer. This may be due to the Antminers subjugate capacity consumption or far ahead cooling in the Antminer, which has more fans and generates a innovative let breathe flow speed. In supplement to the Whatsminer ventilate flow temperature physical considerably warmer than the Antminer, the Whatsminer device itself was along with significantly hotter in the period.

(Note: teetotal measured 15cm away from the miner, directly in the air flow outdoor the main exhaust)

Antminer S19 help vs Whatsminer M30S+: hermetic Comparison

We as a consequence measured the level of noise generated by each machine, by placing a unquestionable meter 15cm away from the miner, in a organization perpendicular to the main ventilate flow. The Whatsminer was the lounder machine, generating an average sound of 83.0 dB, compared to the Antminer bearing in mind 81.4 dB. As Figure 9 below illustrates, the Whatsminer was far and wide more stable, similar to the Antminer hermetic changing regarding four period as much as the Whatsminer. This is a suitably similar savings account to the hashrate, where the Antiminer performs slightly better, but the Whatsminer has forward-looking stability. It will be interesting to look if this means that the Whatsminer proves to be more resilient higher than the long term.

Figure 9 Miner Volume (dB)

(Note: A solid meter was placed 15 cm from the miner, perpendicular to the fan outtake)

(Measuring the level of unquestionable generated by the Whatsminer M30S+)

Air Speed

In what admittedly is probably the least useful metric in this report, we measured the air flow speed. Based upon an average of ten readings, one hour apart, the Antminer generated an average readiness of 5.2 m/s, compared to the Whatsminer with 3.0 m/s.

Figure 10 Miner expose flow speed (m/s)

(Note: air promptness measured 15cm away from the miner, directly in the expose flow uncovered the main exhaust)

(Measuring ventilate speed generated by the Whatsminer M30S+)

Start-up time

A key place where we found the Antminer to be stronger is the boot time. Based on an average of five attempts, the Antminer reached its goal hashrate in approximately four minutes, while the Whatsminer took an average of regarding 27 minutes to boot up. However, this may be due to a safety feature in the Whatsminer.

Figure 11 era for miner to attain try hashrate (minutes)

Logistics and supply chain

One key place where MicroBT is currently excelling compared to Bitmain, is supply chain management. If one wants to buy one of these miners now, there handily is no choice, the Antminer is not currently manageable for sale. We have spoken to numerous Bitmain clients who have complained virtually repeated shipment delays and warehouse problems. We even faced this misery ourselves, MicroBT was dexterous to refer the product in a few days, while Bitmain took just about five weeks, often blaming warehouse problems. The cause of this could be that TSMCs 7nm chips have supply issues accumulate later than the ongoing facility be anxious at Bitmain, which is said to be impacting the logistics network.

Whatsminer vs Antminer: Conclusion

The first concern to note is that the Antminer S19 pro is comprehensibly a greater than before more simulation efficient machine, achieving 29.7 J/TH, far away humiliate than the Whatsminer upon 34.4 J/TH. However, MicroBT has already launched a newer product, open for sale now, the M30S++, taking into account a reported efficiency of 31.0 J/TH. This is nevertheless inferior to Bitmain, however it is beautiful close, especially in imitation of Bitmain uses a difficult feint 7nm TSMC chip, compared to MicroBT using a degrade work 8nm Samsung chip. It should then be noted that the MicroBT products are in the distance cheaper and crucially, understandable now, even if Bitmains products are sold out according to the Bitmain website.

In evaluating the relative strength of the companies and their order outlook, Bitmain yet has the outrage edge in our view. Primarily driven by Bitmains far ahead brand and publish recognition. We have spoken to several mining farm operators and even though they are typically highly annoyed by Bitmains supply chain issues, many of them are fervent to attach to Bitmain without even next MicroBT. MicroBT Whatsminer M30s Review is moreover unquestionably difficult to get a mining farm operator to switch, as sticking to one manufacturer improves functional efficiency and reduces money costs.

As for the products themselves, based on the data in this report, we would conclude the companies are neck and neck, or perhaps, past as soon as everything, Bitmain still has a miniscule lead.