Social activism is basically an intentional act with the aim of collectively achieving social change. If you are passionate about a social issue and are actively working towards such a change, then you may well be regarded as an active social activist. An active social activist is someone who is actively working towards change within society as a social force. Activism can take many forms but basically it involves collective social action directed at achieving particular aims.

There has been a trend recently to move towards more activism online rather than offline. The reason for this is that people are tired of the same old politics. They have tired of voting for a candidate for council who they do not agree with. Or even worse, spending their time bothering other people who live in different areas. Therefore, online activism seems to be a good way of getting involved in local politics without having to bother with the politics of the big city or the national level. However, there are dangers associated with this type of social activism and this article will explain them.

Activists should realise that in the days of the street there was always the risk of being caught and convicted. This resulted in the activists being branded as traitors to the cause they were trying to achieve. However, this is very different with social activism. In the case of social activism, your ideas are examined by people of all ages, backgrounds and walks of life. If you are right then you will be supported and if you are wrong you will be criticised and possibly disowned.

Another problem with human rights activism and most forms of social activism today is that it tends to focus on issues rather than causes. This is why it is difficult to organise street demonstrations against poverty and hunger. Issues are easier to tackle because everyone is thinking the same things but when it comes to hunger and poverty, no one is thinking the same thing.

The point I am making is that there is nothing wrong with being involved in social activism. The only problem with social activism today is that it has lost sight of what it is for. It has become commercialism instead of social welfare and it has lost sight of its purpose. This is why many protestors turn to civil disobedience rather than discuss the political system and their grievances with politicians.

Activists and social media users are also losing track of the original purpose of social media activism. agency was designed to make communication fast and easy. agency can now post whatever they want in public and have it spread instantly. The problem with social media activism is that the people participating in it do not understand why they are being censored and why other citizens are cheering them on.

Many people participate in social media activism because they are aware that human rights are being trampled on by the social media giants. However, their only response to that is to rebel against it and promote their cause online. agency makes perfect sense for people who have a platform and a large following online. If these people really cared about social justice and human rights, they would use their influence to promote social change and not just engage in self-promotion.

The good news is that this type of social action will go away once the general public gets used to it. The bad news is that this type of social activism needs to be done differently. Activist groups need to get proactive and start using controversial social media tactics instead of the typical commercial ones. That way, they will be able to have their message heard without causing a lot of controversy. As the world becomes more comfortable with social action, it will become easier for the average person to engage in this type of social action.